01 / PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS
Describe the friction in concrete terms
Tell us which task is slow, where records disagree and who has to work around the current system. A sample workflow is more useful than a long wish list. We identify the input, the decision, the output and the people who should control each step.
02 / PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS
Choose the smallest useful system
The answer may be an integration, an internal tool or a focused application. It may also be a simpler configuration of software you already own. Discovery compares the implementation effort, operating costs and responsibilities before recommending custom development.
03 / PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS
Use AI only where it earns its place
Language model integrations can help with drafting, retrieval or classification when their output can be reviewed. Deterministic rules are often better for exact calculations and irreversible actions. The architecture should make that distinction explicit rather than inserting an AI layer into every workflow.
04 / PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS
Define acceptance before implementation
A custom system needs examples of correct behaviour, failure handling and access boundaries. We turn those examples into a reviewable scope, then agree how the build will be tested and handed over. Third-party dependencies and recurring provider costs belong in that conversation.